[calixteman]

No description provided.

[github-actions]

Viewer preview

🗑️ Viewer previews removed.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 89.47368% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 90.59%. Comparing base (f70fabb) to head (cef39e5).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/core/wasm_loader.js	90.32%	3 Missing ⚠️
src/core/wasm_image.js	85.71%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #22420      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   90.52%   90.59%   +0.06%     
==========================================
  Files         278      279       +1     
  Lines       68586    68595       +9     
==========================================
+ Hits        62090    62145      +55     
+ Misses       6496     6450      -46     

Flag	Coverage Δ
browsertest	66.26% <71.05%> (+0.04%)	⬆️
fonttest	8.97% <5.26%> (-0.02%)	⬇️
integrationtest	69.60% <50.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
unittest	61.27% <65.78%> (+0.02%)	⬆️
unittestcli	59.03% <86.84%> (+0.02%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[codspeed]

Merging this PR will regress 1 benchmark

⚡ 2 improved benchmarks
❌ 1 regressed benchmark
✅ 85 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 174 skipped benchmarks¹

Warning

Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Efficiency
❌	Ascii85Stream (bug1337429.pdf)	3.7 ms	4.2 ms	-12.33%
⚡	Pattern.parseShading: radial (radial_gradients.pdf)	7.1 ms	6.2 ms	+13.14%
⚡	Lexer: tokenize content stream	14.5 ms	13 ms	+11.83%

Tip

Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.

---

_{Comparing calixteman:wasm_loader (cef39e5) with master (f70fabb)}

Footnotes

1. 174 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

[github-actions]

Reference tests

Results for cef39e5 (run, references from mozilla/pdf.js.refs@d16403bcaa).

Platform	Status	Tests	Total runtime	Errors	Different	FBF	No reference	Report
	✅	1414	12m 4s	0	0	0	0
	✅	1414	15m 21s	0	0	0	0

The report is kept for 30 days and replaced by the next run.

[Snuffleupagus]

r=me, thanks.