Repository navigation
Assessment-derived intervention pilot: demonstrate measurable product improvement from VSM finding #56
Description
Goal
Demonstrate OpenSiro's intended assessment → independently confirmed functional weakness → useful harness change → measured behavior → upstream contribution → feedback cycle, rather than equating a GitHub branch, green test suite, or VSM grade with product improvement.
The owning source is the assessment-driven S1 test contract, routed through the existing Organization Control Plane. This is a candidate Upstream-local research/engineering test, not Organization S1 admission (#274) or new S5 delegation.
Classification — keep distinct
- ASSESSMENT_DERIVED: start from the current canonical Index assessment, identify a specific observed VSM functional mechanism/ownership gap that motivates a falsifiable change, independently confirm a genuine product-native shortfall, implement and measure its product benefit. No mandatory grade increase.
- ASSESSMENT_INFORMED: an assessment points to an important operational subsystem, but the concrete defect was discovered elsewhere (issue, code, maintainer). An independently useful contribution, not a demonstrated assessment-derived diagnosis.
- GENERAL_UPSTREAM: useful contribution with no supported explanatory Index → function → change linkage; count only in generic upstream portfolio.
- INSUFFICIENT: linkage, independent product need, baseline, test or source provenance remains unverified. No class is upgraded from intent alone.
Operator decision checkpoint — 2026-10-22: engineering progress ≠ VSM-derived discovery
Explicit operator priority: Stop counting an upstream-issue-driven repair, a green CI run, a source patch, or an OpenSiro-internal PR as evidence that a VSM assessment discovered a native product defect. They are legitimate engineering results, but a separate origin claim. The current objective of this issue remains to prove the stronger Index-first assessment → specific VSM functional finding → native hypothesis → independently confirmed defect/need → matched before/after benefit → authorized upstream delivery → maintainer feedback chain. That complete chain has not yet been demonstrated. An Index autonomy grade need not rise and no grade repair is required.
Case dispositions, preserving their individual evidence sources (checkpoint only; re-read owning repos for moving status):
| Case | Selection origin and actually demonstrated evidence | May count toward a completed strict assessment-derived cycle? |
|---|---|---|
| Kit #222 / OpenSiro PR #70 | First-party Kit issue #222 supplied the concrete startup defect. Source-pinned native Config::load RED/GREEN and real local CLI baseline/after, broad Linux tests; an ASSESSMENT_INFORMED engineering fix. |
No. The canonical assessment did not identify the missing subagent.harness field. Internal PR is not an external Kit merge. |
| Agent Code #524 / OpenSiro PR #69 | First-party issue #524 supplied the reviewer need. Offline implementation/tests confirm source/process contracts but not real-model reviewer quality; assessment lineage does not establish independent defect discovery. | No. An issue-driven/assessment-informed source contribution; no measured model-review improvement or external acceptance. |
| HarnessDesk #1772 / validation PR #55 | Source and first-party issue #1772 identified the socket-ownership defect; pinned check/tests validate a local fix. Canonical Index assessment did not diagnose this specific defect. | No. ASSESSMENT_INFORMED; no external upstream acceptance represented by internal CI. |
| AgentDescent #453 / internal PR #68 | First-party issue #453 supplied the demo-skill defect; upstream PR #459 fixed it independently and merged. OpenSiro internal patch was closed without merge. | No. ASSESSMENT_INFORMED; do not claim authorship/merge of #459. |
| Zot source-pinned baseline | An Index-first assessment-derived hypothesis and executed controlled two-worker shared-workspace lost-update baseline. It has no accepted native fix or matched after measurement; lightweight shared workspace may be deliberate. | Not yet. ASSESSMENT_DERIVED_HYPOTHESIS_NOT_ADMITTED; hazard reproduced, INCONCLUSIVE product improvement. |
| AgentBox S2 issue #61 | Preferred next index-first candidate: assessment-linked manager/task file-write overlap coordination with first-party planned capability. Native design fit, contemporary source status and counterfactual behavior still need independent confirmation. | Candidate only, not a qualified improvement or proof of benefit. |
Default next investigation for the strict goal: AgentBox #61. Re-bootstrap from today's canonical Index (all S1/S2/S3/S3*/S4/S5 functions and assessment evidence where relevant), independently pin AgentBox's current default source and first-party manager plan, and check whether the observed S2 coordination/feedback shortfall genuinely predicts a native problem worth solving. Record the first-party native fit gates need/mechanism/counterfactual/scope, seek maintainer design feedback before large feature work, freeze a falsifiable conflict-plus-disjoint-tasks before/after protocol, then proceed only if fit permits. Distinguish exploratory S2 improvement from a proven missing capability; original AgentBox issue #61 owns the exact research hypothesis.
Do not (a) spend the strict-derived experiment solely polishing Kit/Agent Code/HarnessDesk or searching for an easy external issue; (b) retroactively attach an Index grade to those patches; (c) call AgentBox QUALIFIED/SELECTED before all gates pass; (d) treat internal CI/PR or external issue closure as upstream publication; (e) change Index assessment grades without separate Index/Skills authority; (f) create a fork, push to external repos, or publish PRs without existing exact-stage approval. Ordinary issue-driven contributions can proceed separately under the generic upstream portfolio. If the Index-first screen produces no native fit, report NO_ELIGIBLE_ASSESSMENT_CANDIDATE rather than manufacturing success.
Canonical methodological definitions: assessment-to-improvement contract and assessment-driven S1 test. Candidate intake, not executable permission: draft PR #67. This checkpoint is a research-priority/attribution decision only; it does not activate a new S1 domain, S5 mandate, autonomy grant or GitHub write stage.
Current HarnessDesk #1772 disposition
Canonical HarnessDesk assessment records the shared tool projection and S1/S2 coordination mechanisms in the system-in-focus. Independently discovered upstream issue #1772 identifies a second host unlinking tools.sock. The V2 patch remedies that reliability defect, with pinned build/tests and full pnpm check:push green. Classification: ASSESSMENT_INFORMED, not a validated VSM functional-deficit intervention. No change has reached the external fork contribution branch or upstream PR. Retain this as legitimate engineering work; do not claim S2 grade changed, that assessment found socket ownership bug, or that product effect is observed in a released HarnessDesk.
New strong first pilot — index first
- Independently refresh Index
main; record index SHA, included assessment path, exact reviewed source ref, target function, observed decision/feedback owner, supported weakness within assessed system boundaries. Do not automatically pick HarnessDesk or reverse-engineer one from an easy issue/fork. - State the specific behavior to improve and a falsifiable proposed design. The VSM finding must explain why this intervention is selected, not just provide a citation or suggest raising an A/C/P label.
- Check source default branch and actual active development branch, maintainer expectations, existing behavior, open issues/PRs, licensing/policy, compatibility, and non-VSM counterfactual user value. If unmet:
NO_ELIGIBLE_ASSESSMENT_CANDIDATEorBLOCKED_EVIDENCE. - Prepare reproducible before scenario/metric and matched after evaluation in the same product environment. Examples are conflict handling latency, safely autonomous resolution of known current-control disturbances, failure/rollback rate, human interventions; metrics must fit the actual identified function, not be preselected as an artificial test. Specify negative regression/safety checks and evidence boundaries.
- Implement scoped upstream-native patch, verify red→green behavior plus native test/check gate, compare real outcomes, record confounders, adverse behavior, source/commit pins, and whether observations actually support product improvement. Reassessment, if useful, is separate Index/Skills work; a PR cannot self-award a VSM grade.
- Prepare and, only under the applicable grant, write to an owner-approved contributor fork. External PR publication remains human-owned. Record maintainer outcome without claiming upstream acceptance in advance.
Exit / handoff
Create a reviewable, non-authorizing assessment-to-improvement case with evidence links and statuses for origin, functional hypothesis, independent native-fit gates, baseline, intervention, post-change comparison, upstream lifecycle, authorization and feedback. First qualified candidate selection is a new evidence task, not implicitly HarnessDesk #1772. No new bot, service, token or formal Organization S1 admission.
Track implementation via an ordinary reviewable PR in this repository, preserving #6 as the execution gate owner. The HarnessDesk PR validation #55 remains independently useful and should not be relabelled as a full assessment-derived win.
Activity
xLagerFeuer commentedon Oct 20, 2026
2026-10-20 — fresh Index-first screening + genuine Zot baseline
Canonical origin first:
opensiro/vsm-harness-index main@5393b698bfdfa4ca14d97a79238234eca20694e5,data/signatures.psv/data/catalog.psvfollowed by included assessment files, then independent live public target source/issues/PRs. This is a bounded sample, not an exhaustive corpus search.Upstream PR #58 records a five-case screening of Zot, CrewAI, stcode, AgentBox and Agent Squad. Important negative: CrewAI #7764 already has directly overlapping open PR #8043; don't invent a duplicate intervention. The assessed
S2=—of any harness is not itself a native defect.Zot investigation lead, still NOT an admitted assessment-derived improvement: Index
assessments/zo/zot.mdexplicitly identifies shared workspace write collision risk, assessed source2a19df15ba8278dd6a92240ab6c2ae267c3cf6c3. Current Zotmain@c62d1c5first-partypackages/agent/swarm/swarm.goand README still intentionally run concurrent children in the hostRepoRootwithout worktrees/isolation. The documented product choice is real. No first-party user demand or maintainers' acceptance of a new collision-control mode found yet.Genuine read-only Go test execution: GitHub Actions #39474300697 SUCCESS on pinned public Zot source/Go 1.25; exact runner log:
workers_reported_done=2, worker_updates_intended=2, final_updates_preserved=1, lost_updates=1, native_conflict_feedback=not_observed. Two model-free injected ZotRunnerFuncworkers independently read the same file, then a deterministic write ordering overwrote one edit; both first-party swarm statuses weredone. This demonstrates one controlled hazard, not its empirical frequency, a confirmed native bug, or measured benefit from a fix. Full baseline receipt.Four native-fit gates: mechanism
PASS_BOUNDARY_ONLY; real need, counterfactual benefit and compatibility allPENDING. ThereforeINSUFFICIENT / BLOCKED_EVIDENCEfor fully admitted intervention, product outcomeINCONCLUSIVE, no after-code or external contribution. Zot's CONTRIBUTING explicitly requests maintainer feedback before substantial API/multi-package changes. A human-owned design discussion draft is prepared but NOT posted to Zot. It asks if an opt-in collision warning/refusal compatible with the intentional shared-cwd mode is desirable.No fork, upstream issue, PR or maintainer contact was made; no agent writer mandate was activated or regrade performed. The experiment can proceed to matched after-case and source-only prototype only once independent native fit/design evidence exists, or record a bounded negative candidate and continue a fresh Index screen. PR #57 already merged the protocol.
xLagerFeuer commentedon Oct 20, 2026
Integration checkpoint — 2026-10-20
Research PR #58 is now MERGED on owning
opensiro/upstream main@63c3bf8db1a430e0e26e246a7a89317a547817f8. Exact PR-head Zot Go pinned-source baseline and OpenSiro tests are SUCCESS; current post-merge check is separate. Main now owns the screened candidate set, observed reproducible baseline receipt and the unpublished Zot maintainer-feedback draft. No code, branch, issue, or PR was written to Zot.Experiment is NOT CLOSED as improvement: native-fit demand and compatibility remain PENDING; no after-case, deployed gain, S2 grade change, or accepted upstream contribution. The next stage is to establish maintainer/product acceptance of an optional, default-preserving conflict-safety mechanism, or record a negative screen and continue Index-first discovery.
xLagerFeuer commentedon Oct 20, 2026
2026-10-20 — controlled after-case executed; source-only research merged
Merged: Upstream PR #59 into
main@a40614924a69241fcd4bc149f5020516eb53ec7b. This adds only OpenSiro-held source-only experimental Go files, an ephemeral runner CI workflow, a pre/post plan and the actual after-case receipt. It does not change Zot, fork it, create an external issue/PR or enable an OpenSiro writer.Verified same-source comparison: fresh public pinned Zot
main@c62d1c549d52cd33390968ffa50667cb79609152, Go 1.25.0, real Zotpackages/agent/swarmlifecycle plus deterministic injected model-freeRunnerFuncworkers. Actual-raceCI logs and exact final PR-head recheck both SUCCESS; full native package tests also success. Baseline separate CI SUCCESS. OpenSiro 420 unit tests PASS andgit diff --checkPASS.Most important native-fit blocker discovered during after review: first-party Zot background runners are long-lived conversations, while this synthetic wrapper releases claims at process exit, not per logical task turn. It does not enforce declared file scopes at edit tools, and has no cross-process/alias/symlink/restart guarantees. Therefore a green proof-of-mechanism does not justify user-facing Zot adoption or
S2=A. Zot deliberately documents shared writable worktrees and requests design consultation for broader changes.Current #56 position:
Do not reclassify the earlier HarnessDesk #1772 assessment-informed reliability patch or modify canonical Index grades. Upstream research is a different evidence channel from external product contribution.
xLagerFeuer commentedon Oct 20, 2026
2026-10-20 — native Zot tool & task-turn boundary negatives reproduced, research merged
Owning merged research: OpenSiro Upstream PR #60,
main@2ab08f9dbc92fbec250cc9659eb6895437f6b29d. Exact final PR-head CI results: new native-tool/turn test SUCCESS, unchanged pinned baseline SUCCESS, earlier scoped after-case SUCCESS, OpenSiro tests SUCCESS. Local420/420Python tests PASS andgit diff --checkPASS. A prior fixture-specific escaped-string syntax mistake failed formatting before Go tests and was corrected; not hidden as a Zot failure.Actual pinned source: canonical Index
5393b698bfdfa4ca14d97a79238234eca20694e5→ Zot assessmentassessments/zo/zot.md→ currentpatriceckhart/zot@c62d1c549d52cd33390968ffa50667cb79609152, all experiments use identical Zot SHA.New measured negative coverage:
TestAssessmentLongLivedPromptTurnDoesNotReleaseScope: real ZotnotifyPromptTurnEndreports logical task completion,OnTurnEndfires, the synthetic worker continues alive, and the voluntaryScopedSpawnerholds its scope until process exit. Consequently the next declared same-file task is rejected after logical work has completed.TestAssessmentNativeWriteAndEditBypassDeclaredScope: while one declared worker holds the file and another declared start is rejected, an independent native ZotSwarminvokes realWriteTool.ExecuteandEditTool.Executeagainst the same temporary file and succeeds. No global tool authorization was installed in the prototype. This shows coverage failure of the experimental wrapper, not a bypass of a claimed first-party Zot security boundary.-raceboth tests PASS; entire nativeswarmandtoolspackage suites PASS. Model-backed genuine user sessions were not exercised.BashTool.Executesource also launches shell processes which can mutate files; no claim of blocking shell writes. Other aliases/symlinks/cross-process writers are also not contained.Execution receipt, probe code.
Experiment disposition:
OBSERVED_TOOL_AND_TURN_GAPS/PRIOR_SCOPED_ADMISSION_INTEGRATION_INSUFFICIENT. The earlier conditional synthetic1/2 → 2/2after-case remains true but is not yet a usable Zot improvement. Independent native need, product fit, endorsed design, actual task-turn/tool-enforced solution, real-user effects and fork/PR publication remainPENDING. Zot's shared-cwd default is documented and intentional. No external Zot issue/PR/contact/branch/fork change, no Index regrade, and no fourth Organization S1 admission. Proposed next step is a maintainer-reviewed opt-in design or an explicit bounded negative case; do not build a new S3 service or claim security from voluntary file path declarations.xLagerFeuer commentedon Oct 20, 2026
2026-10-20 — Zot manual Git worktree counterfactual: measured, no native patch admitted
Reviewable OpenSiro PR: #62, MERGED to
upstream/main@62b6cb99b0094e7b2138b99dbcc4276e4815add5from reviewed head170ac50183e86e40933a15093735b76e1adaed54. Source-only experiment, no Zot upstream/fork writes.Source/provenance: canonical Index Zot assessment @5393b698 → independently inspected Zot main@c62d1c5 → actual native
Swarm+WriteTool.Executepaired test. Predeclared protocol and executed receipt.Actual measured readout: first PR CI run #39482685537, SUCCESS including
go test -raceand fullswarm/toolssuites. SharedRepoRoot: both native writers succeed, only 1/2 independent updates survives and no native collision feedback. Two manually created Git worktrees and two independent ZotRepoRoots: 2/2 branch edits preserved, 0 same-workspace overwrites; Git merge produces 1 explicit conflict, not automatic reconciliation. Updated source-only receipt commit triggers revalidation #39482937216, SUCCESS on the final PR head (including race/native-tool comparison and full affected suites). All five workflows on the final PR head completed SUCCESS: worktree counterfactual #39482937216, shared-root baseline #39482937427, scoped after-case #39482937643, native tool/turn gap #39482937587, OpenSiro fork lifecycle tests #39482937456.Interpretation: proves a manual no-code containment alternative, not a Zot product improvement. Zot itself deliberately defaults to shared cwd; no built-in worktree creation or file isolation was added. The previous voluntary
ScopedSpawnerremains invalid for task/turn lifecycle and tool enforcement. Model-backed user value, cost of worktree management/merging, feature need, native API fit, and actual maintainer feedback remain unproven.Native fit: Index mechanism supported; documented shared-write risk observed; new first-party feature need
PENDING, scopePENDING, product-native changeBLOCKED_EVIDENCE. NO_GO for inventing a Zot scope manager without independent need/maintainer design input. Do not regrade Index or treat this as fourth Organization S1.Next Index-first candidate screen: current canonical AgentBox assessment at target review_ref
463a6a0a…explicitly identifies a manual cross-box collision coordination gap; fresh AgentBox main@605ee75d and its first-party manager plan describe manager file-overlap grouping as planned (Phase 4), not shipped. The need is first-party anticipated, but existing roadmap ownership, scope, and a minimum independently useful change remain PENDING. No second candidate admitted or upstream contact made yet.Additional current Index-first overlap check (CrewAI): included canonical CrewAI assessment @ Index 5393b698 describes no standalone independent audit path; fresh CrewAI main@a8877f0c and open feature #7764 establish native demand for a separate string-guardrail judging LLM, but an already-open overlapping PR #8043 provides precisely this design. NO_DUPLICATE / no new CrewAI intervention admitted; separate-LLM configuration alone would not prove VSM S3* independent corrective closure. This is an overlap/fit screen, not an executed CrewAI benchmark.
xLagerFeuer commentedon Oct 20, 2026
Assessment-derived pilot checkpoint — native AgentBox baseline
After stopping further speculative Zot feature work (its shared writable cwd is an intentional default, and earlier opt-in scoped spawn is not tool-enforced or turn-scoped), selected AgentBox pilot #61 from canonical Index-first screening. The AgentBox native-fit selection merged in #63: current first-party
docs/workspaces-tasks-manager-plan.mdexplicitly says grouping cross-box file conflicts is manual and the manager brief Phase 4 remains planned. That supplies independent first-party product-need evidence stronger than Zot's speculative collision-protection feature.Native source baseline PR #64 MERGED,
opensiro/upstream main@292eab2b1aa7f7b0dc85b74f2f6a4bf7ea28f2e3. The original AgentBoxmain@605ee75...Node 22 / pnpm 9.15.0 full build was PASS (26/26 tasks); original CLIpreflightTaskAssignmentandassignTasksBestEffortadmitted three valid tasks, including two with same-file description intents assigned to distinct boxes. Source-only injected Vitest 1/1 PASS, no real boxes/providers/files touched. CI #39483518571; execution receipt. OpenSiro CI SUCCESS.What is proven: the pinned CLI preflight does not evaluate reliable path overlap and no authoritative write set exists in the native
WorkTaskschema. Not proven: destructive real-AgentBox work collision, user demand for a particular algorithm, a source-integrated coordination remedy, any before/after product gain, maintainer acceptance or upstream publication. The potential intervention is an optional manager planning/feedback loop grouping or serializing overlapping tasks before dispatch while preserving disjoint concurrency and human authority. AgentBox requires an issue for nontrivial new features, therefore a design inquiry draft is prepared but not posted. Continue once native design feedback exists; do not manufacture feature scope to achieve a grade or merely another green PR.Status:
ASSESSMENT_DERIVED_ORIGIN+NATIVE_BASELINE_MEASURED/NEED=PASS_ROADMAP/DESIGN_APPROVAL=PENDING/AFTER=NOT_MEASURED/EXTERNAL_PR=NOT_PUBLISHED. ZotHOLD_NATIVE_NEED; unrelated AgentBox #401 has PR #402, #407 remains a separate reliability issue. No changes to outside repositories, fork authorization, Index grading or Organization S1 boundaries.xLagerFeuer commentedon Oct 20, 2026
2026-10-20 — AgentBox #61 advanced from CLI-only mock baseline to native relay dependency observation
Merged: Upstream PR #65,
main@f018f0c495bae6d1a73497f1e38bceddba97fabf. Owning AgentBox #61 detailed checkpoint. Receipt.Actual product-native source baseline: canonical Index AgentBox S2 assessment
5393b698→ fresh first-partymadarco/agentbox@605ee75d, direct@agentbox/relaytask store rather than a mocked CLI service. Node 22/pnpm 9.15.0, original full build 26/26, source-only native Vitest 1/1, CI #39485701659 SUCCESS; prior CLI baseline #39485701451 SUCCESS, OpenSiro tests #39485701561 SUCCESS. 2/2 tested unfinished-dependent allocation routes accepted/markedin_progress; completed predecessor also accepted. No Docker box, worker execution or end-user file collision was created.Interpretation: one stronger observed coordination metadata boundary, not a deployed product improvement or proven user-facing bug.
dependsOnis first-party structured data;in_progressmay mean allocation, not execution. Whether dependent assignments must be blocked is a maintainer design decision, and the exact dependency subfinding is not independently named by the Index assessment. Keep assessment-derived S2 area separate from precise defect provenance.Current result:
AGENTBOX_NATIVE_BASELINE_MEASURED,PRODUCT_NEED=PASS_ROADMAP,DESIGN_SCOPE=BLOCKED_FEEDBACK,AFTER_EFFECT=NOT_MEASURED,EXTERNAL_CONTRIBUTION=NOT_STARTED. Updated unpublished AgentBox design inquiry now asks whether advisory preassignment or manager-only readiness is desired. No AgentBox external issue/fork/PR/contact was created, no Index grade change, and Upstream is not a fourth admitted Organization S1 function. Zot remains HOLD and #56 remains OPEN.Next authorized stage: read-only scope/counterfactual analysis can continue; a native AgentBox behavior change should only follow first-party design input under their CONTRIBUTING issue-first policy and separately authorized external publication. The human-owned design inquiry is the operational blocker to implementation.
xLagerFeuer commentedon Oct 20, 2026
2026-10-20 — follow-up batch: AgentBox native-fit stop + four independent Index screens
Research merged: Upstream PR #66, owner
main@2c5610b94fa6f3d7f3b59dadfd3b04c82cfc6c85. Evidence table and qualified negatives. AgentBox #61 detailed checkpoint. All three final PR-head workflows SUCCESS: native dependency, task preflight baseline, OpenSiro tests. Exactly two owner-doc files, no upstream AgentBox code/fork/issue/PR changes.The Index first-party S2 finding supports AgentBox coordination area, not a specific
dependsOnbug: earlier native baseline shows 2/2 unfinished-dependent task allocations markedin_progress, which may represent preassignment rather than execution. Changing task-store status enforcement could invalidate intended manager behavior. The concrete product need for Phase 4 grouping is first-party documented; the correct implementation envelope remains BLOCKED_MAINTAINER_DESIGN_FEEDBACK.Independently screened four further current included assessments from canonical Index
5393b698: Claw Code (product README disclaims production priority / museum exhibit, issue #3153 closed), KairoCode (prototype and isolated worktrees), AtomCode (per-file partition; no observed specific residual collision), Dendrophis (no qualifying concurrently viable S1s at assessed runtime). No more product-qualified S2 patch was established from this bounded sample. Do not substitute grade repair or standalone code-tests for actual product improvement.Current #56 result: PARTIAL / PRODUCT_BENEFIT_INCONCLUSIVE. Assessment-derived hypothesis and native baseline confirmed for AgentBox; external system remains unmodified.
PATCH_NOT_ADMITTED,BEFORE_AFTER_NOT_MEASURED,UPSTREAM_PUBLICATION_NOT_STARTED,MAINTAINER_FEEDBACK_NONE. Do not regrade Index or admit a fourth Organization S1 domain.Next effective gate: a deliberate authorized external AgentBox design inquiry draft to decide opt-in manager-only coordination vs deliberately manual planning. It has NOT been posted. Proceed to actual source-native before/after only after first-party design acceptance or new independently established defect. #56 stays OPEN.
xLagerFeuer commentedon Oct 20, 2026
Lifecycle correction — 2026-10-20: The documentation-only PR #66 was merged successfully, but GitHub interpreted the phrase “does not close #56/#61” in its description as a closing keyword and automatically closed #56 at 20:06:59 UTC. That accidental auto-close was not an experiment-success decision. The ambiguous PR wording has been corrected and #56 reopened. Product improvement, external submission, and maintainer feedback remain unfinished; see the research checkpoint.
xLagerFeuer commentedon Oct 20, 2026
2026-10-20 — proposed pipeline split (DRAFT PR, no external action)
Draft PR #67, head
0c3fa70bcb1eeb1a49964c9d670e33a0bf910e7a, proposes a separate improvement candidate intake between canonical Index and the existingproposal_onlycontribution execution stage. Design / candidate cards.Explicit research-only candidates (separate stable IDs):
ASSESSMENT_DERIVEDhypothesis,BLOCKED_EVIDENCEwaiting for native manager scope/maintainer input.ASSESSMENT_INFORMEDexact code finding,PARKED; nativein_progressdoes not prove a worker started early.ASSESSMENT_DERIVEDhypothesis,PARKED; manual worktree mitigation is measured but new Zot-native change demand unproven.External AgentBox issue draft has been narrowed to one candidate: opt-in Phase 4 manager grouping, with
dependsOnexpressly outside the first change.No effective S1/test/permission schema changed:
registry.yamlremains actual contributions/forks, batch proposals remain post-selection preview, Index grades and Organization scope unchanged. This Draft PR is not merged or adopted. No external AgentBox issue, fork, PR or contact created. #56 remains active.xLagerFeuer commentedon Oct 20, 2026
Improvement-candidate intake: Draft PR #67 executable read-only integrity checkpoint (2026-10-20)
Draft PR #67, head
4def94760caa966c2c2be39118fb5fbbbd6e3522, now includes the proposedassessment → separate improvement candidates → qualified selection → existing contribution proposalboundary, with three separate cards (AgentBox file overlap, AgentBox dependency semantics, Zot shared writes) and an unpublished AgentBox upstream design inquiry scoped only to file-overlap Phase 4 manager planning.A new credential-free read-only integrity tool checks candidate ID uniqueness, declared origin and pinned SHA/path syntax, research status, four fit declarations and disallows
QUALIFIED/SELECTEDwith incomplete gates. Importantly, it supports the legitimate zero-candidate discovery result. The tool never verifies live Index or native benefit, generates proposal/fork/PR, or grants transition rights; output hardcodesNOT_APPROVED_NO_GITHUB_WRITESandcandidate_transition_authorized=false.Exact final head verification: 436 local unit tests PASS,
git diff --checkPASS, dedicated improvement candidate workflow SUCCESS, fork lifecycle SUCCESS, AgentBox dependency SUCCESS, AgentBox task-conflict SUCCESS.Disposition: internal design/prototype DRAFT / NOT MERGED / NOT ADOPTED AS OPERATIONAL GATE. No native AgentBox or Zot code changed, external issue/PR/maintainer contact or Index regrade. The separate candidate-to-existing-
proposal_onlytransition still requires verified product fit and a deliberate owner decision. Experiment #56 remains open.xLagerFeuer commentedon Oct 20, 2026
Improvement Candidates → contribution proposal handoff prototype (2026-10-20)
Draft Upstream PR #67 advanced to source-only, non-authorizing candidate → pre-existing proposal linkage. Current PR head
5f49beb77bb4a7888088feaee06f598a5110119f. The new local linker composes the existing frozen Index source preflight with a separate candidate card andproposal_onlymanifest. Target identity, assessment/review ref, four declared fit gates, blockers, and proposal digest are structurally cross-checked; positive synthetic data cannot authenticate native fit or a live operator decision.453 local tests PASS,
git diff --checkPASS, 4/4 exact final-head CI SUCCESS: candidate, fork lifecycle, AgentBox preflight, AgentBox dependency. Full validation comment.Boundary remains enforced: all three real candidates are
PARKED/BLOCKED_EVIDENCE; zero are product-qualified. Nobatch_proposals.pyschema change, no generated proposal from a card, no external fork/branch/PR, no Index regrade/Organization admission, no right to publish AgentBox design inquiry. Output always saysNOT_APPROVED_NO_GITHUB_WRITES. PR #67 is still DRAFT. Parent experiment is not finished by this handoff implementation.xLagerFeuer commentedon Oct 20, 2026
2026-10-21 — separate improvement-candidate screen and Kit issue-backed intake
Draft Upstream PR #67, current head
4f17909456d58ba16d8a947cb33bc1c1d164e149, now records four distinct improvement hypotheses rather than equating each Index observation with a contribution. Bounded screen inspected current Index5393b698, assessed S2 observations and current source/issue surfaces for Crabot, bash-agent, Travis234 and Kit, while excluding an unresolvable VisvoAI current-source ref. This was not an exhaustive Index ranking; absence of actionable native need was preserved as a negative screen.New, separate Kit candidate: IMPR-KIT-SUBAGENT-CONFIG-20261021
SCREENING / ASSESSMENT_INFORMED. Kit issue #222 documents a specific optional subagent configuration that prevents starting new sessions; currentsrc/main.rs@8f9f08astill requiresSubagentConfig.harness: String. The Index does not diagnose this startup bug and it is not counted as an assessment-derived S2 success. Fresh-main executable reproduction and compatible fallback design remain pending; current local source host lackscargo/rustc.Index card provenance: frozen local
git showsource confirmed included assessment identity/review_ref/target match for all four cards at actual Index HEAD5393b698. This is source identity, not independent native fit, positive effect or permission.Local validation:
453/453unit tests PASS,git diff --checkPASS, candidate markdown links PASS, read-only inventory gives0 QUALIFIED/NOT_APPROVED_NO_GITHUB_WRITES. Exact-final-head CI candidate and fork lifecycle success; AgentBox source-pinned regression workflows pending when recorded. No external fork, issue, PR, code change, canonical assessment change, or Organization admission. PR #67 remains DRAFT.46 remaining items
xLagerFeuer commentedon Nov 11, 2026
External publication wave checkpoint — 2026-11-11
GitHub readback, not an upstream adoption or VSM-grade claim:
murilo-bassan/durable-agent-runtimexingyaoww/code-actyologdev/yoagentcargo test --libPASS; all-features NOT completed due temporary disk exhaustionFonaTech/Clouds-Coder6f187a3, test relocation needed: two deterministic original failures (RED 2/2) → four fixed/control PASS; split generator touched 73 tracked files, full >1,000-testpytestdid not complete in the bounded 5-minute runleprachuan/Wee-OrchestratorLICENSEvs MITpyproject.tomlcontradictionsimonguo/evidenceloomPrepared older fork-local PRs phax #1, Honey-I-Shrunk-the-Harness #1, and voly #1 remain unpublished externally because their respective required full test/source-drift, A/B test, or DCO gates are unresolved. Fork-local is not external publication. All newly published third-party PRs use disclosure v3 and are Open/Ready; no third-party merge was attempted.
Host caveat: parallel
cargo test --all-featureson dev-alpha-2 exhausted temporary disk twice. Only job-specific temporary Rust build artifacts were cleared after verification; no source changes were removed. Avoid concurrent heavy tests on the same 108GB filesystem.xLagerFeuer commentedon Nov 11, 2026
2026-11-11 standing-mandate publication checkpoint (GitHub readback verified): Clouds-Coder fork-local opensiro-contributions/Clouds-Coder#1 → external FonaTech/Clouds-Coder#50 (Open/Ready, head 9b396673, 3 files; native 61/61 collaboration and 6/6 split tests PASS, full repository pytest not confirmed); yoagent fork-local opensiro-contributions/yoagent#1 → external yologdev/yoagent#450 (Open/Ready, head b06e768, 2 files; fmt/clippy/rustdoc PASS; full Linux all-features 1937 PASS, 0 FAIL, 17 ignored with DAC capabilities restricted). Both external descriptions use exact v3 disclosure; created PRs read back and confirmed. CodeAct #26 is already published (no duplicate). Wee Orchestrator blocked by license conflict; Evidence Loom by issue-first/DCO. The real two-publication ledger and exact 28→30 maintenance watchlist migration are proposed in #238 (Open; GitHub Actions queued). No third-party merge or maintainer acceptance claimed.
xLagerFeuer commentedon Nov 11, 2026
External publication continuation checkpoint — 2026-11-11 (standing mandate)
GitHub source of truth, no third-party merge or adoption assertion.
murilo-bassan/durable-agent-runtimexingyaoww/code-actyologdev/yoagentFonaTech/Clouds-Coderlbdremy/phaxpnpm check:fullexit 0 on Node 24 and exact head45e90ea: 429/429 unit and 238/238 integration test files; build and site:build PASS75afd70; registered by merged #239The authenticated GitHub external readbacks confirm open/non-draft and matching source branch head. The dated publication ledger, maintenance manifest, checkpoint migration and generated status are now in current
mainat07b53e4e(31 watchlist targets). #239 repository-integrity/verify/validate CI PASS.Still not publishable: Honey-I-Shrunk-the-Harness fork #1 updated via no-force fast-forward to
d600691and exact original-main base12307939, two-file diff, native source-pinned 9/9 regression evidence; original contributor policy requires the completepnpm turbo run lint check-types testand a paid/model A/B for changed agent behavior, not claimed completed. VOLY fork #1 still requires human-person DCO legal signature and full native gate. Wee Orchestrator has an upstream GPL-3.0LICENSEvs MIT project-metadata conflict. Evidence Loom requires issue-first and human DCO. No fake external PRs or maintainer merges were made for these blocked cases.The reported benefits are bounded source-native correctness findings and PR publication evidence, not verified external adoption or automatic VSM-grade improvement.
xLagerFeuer commentedon Nov 11, 2026
Source-first publication continuation checkpoint — 2026-11-11 UTC
The owning Upstream evidence PR #241 is merged at
6f3634f0d082e391e5e1aae231189c816ec87732; two new source-native receipts are on main. This is not an external-PR submission, deployment, third-party acceptance or VSM-grade claim.d600691; 2-file original-main-based diffpnpm turbo run lint check-types test14/14 tasks PASS, core 2,193 PASS / 1 SKIP / 0 FAIL (receipt)b42ec77; 3-file original-main-based diff including docspytest tests/1,228 PASS / 4 SKIP / 1 XFAIL / 0 FAIL, docs checks PASS (receipt)4f34d573has GPL-3.0LICENSEwhilepyproject.tomland README assert MIT. Conflicting first-party license evidence: fail closed.EXPLICIT_PATCH_HASH_MATCHEDhandoffExhaustive exact-patch inventory boundary: the current generated Upstream working inventory contains 16
AWAITING_EXTERNALhandoffs with anEXPLICIT_PATCH_HASH_MATCHEDpacket. Of those, 13 source identities have dated external publication receipts; the other 3 are precisely Honey, VOLY and Wee above. This is not the entire Upstream candidate pool or a universal count of GitHub PRs. Evidence Loom does not have an eligible matched publication packet. No convenient sixth source was silently substituted.Remaining action is third-party requirement satisfaction or a new independently validated source-native patch from a later wave, not a repeated OpenSiro owner approval. Do not amend frozen batch evidence, self-sign legal attestations, infer an external merge or mark the strict assessment-derived discovery cycle fully closed.
xLagerFeuer commentedon Nov 11, 2026
2026-11-12 Wee S2 continuation — source-native nonregression and fork-local proposal, not external publication.
leprachuan/Wee-Orchestrator/main@4f34d5737910098c79f2ee42d0f3f383cfca830f; direct public fork with matchingmain; tested branchopensiro/wee-delegation-cleanup@f0a911093aaec0d32c49e434008262bb2540774f../run_tests.sh: 1,669 tests, 92 failures, 243 errors, 14 skipped; work head: 1,670 tests, same 92 failures / 243 errors / 14 skipped. Exact lists of failing and error test names match. Baseline environment lacksfastapi,keyring,copilotand assumes files under/opt/n8n-copilot-shim-dev. Logs SHA256 baseline7888974a414da337df10c49f00a1e310a8e962ec94315e309e39e9fd7e25635c, work head1b1860cadc93927e7dc4b23ec3df65c165f840abf753baa61ac9cf799a5178bc../run_tests.shsuccess; focused RED/GREEN and nonregression alone do not satisfy it. This remainsASSESSMENT_DERIVED / AWAITING_EXTERNAL, not completed adoption/benefit.xLagerFeuer commentedon Nov 12, 2026
Revka preparation checkpoint (2026-11-12; current Upstream main dad9c98):
Next engineering work: improve safe materialization/recovery diagnosis in a reviewable internal PR and obtain a new exact trusted one-use decision only after the previous attempt has been fully reconciled; do not bypass protected adapter or retry blindly.
xLagerFeuer commentedon Nov 12, 2026
Revka fork-local preparation COMPLETED (2026-11-12, current controlling Upstream main 87bc12d):
xLagerFeuer commentedon Nov 12, 2026
Friday S2 — bounded assessment-derived external merge (2026-11-12)
Provider-backed external merge + independent native correctness; NOT deployed-user benefit or a VSM regrade.
splashxmoon/friday@079c5af5: original 0/2 alias checks passing, patched 2/2, combined native controls 12/12 PASS, TypeScript typecheck PASS. The source-level mechanism is actualheldBy()custody resolution, not a simulated agent-quality result.9cdbe26b6e4cb61f88c1fe6e9a6dda503a3b6cb6. The original maintainer acknowledged the real fix/test and said it will ship in a subsequent update; release and deployed effect have not been verified.origin=ASSESSMENT_DERIVED_HYPOTHESIS,measurement_level=NATIVE_TOOL_BEHAVIOR,external_delivery=MERGED,product_benefit=NOT_MEASURED. No user-productivity, production rollout or Index autonomy score is inferred.upstream/main@eaf7db70f0eeec57a89cc4172d9e00a2113fc2ef: 695/695 tests PASS, generated effects/workspace/status/outcome checks PASS.The five reviewed original sources
0xNyk/lacp,chekusu/wanman,gczhuang-cmd/NovaCode,mnbresearch/crewdeck, andsplashxmoon/fridayalready have external PR identities (first four open at checkpoint, Friday merged); do not duplicate. Continue source-disjoint screening and maintenance. A bounded native benefit and maintainer merge do not independently demonstrate deployed-user benefit or autonomous S1 grade.xLagerFeuer commentedon Nov 12, 2026
Five-source upstream publication gate readback — 2026-11-12
Owner: Upstream #56 / #6. Read-only live GitHub GET and current first-party contributor docs; distinct original repositories. No branch push, external PR POST, CLA or DCO attestation in this wave.
master@679a8a7097ff088d7f780f2b8d026170b142317bmain@12307939c8dee2c64220752a788f105588e82c82main@a1acd826502e12a6c2f3d147e488a7d2982c480bmain@4f34d5737910098c79f2ee42d0f3f383cfca830fmain@38aa1bf7074f7b1e0f79f559dfa3fc97d75a073dDisposition: 0 newly published original-project PRs in this five-source gate wave. Do not relabel those fork-local proposals as published. No added human preparation approval requested; the remaining gates are target-native technical/legal boundaries. No test was rerun in this read-only gate review. Follow the next five-source selection separately, excluding already published and overlap-blocked targets.
Separate completed historical lifecycle reconciliation: opensiro/upstream #260 was merged with 695/695 Upstream tests, and recorded five already-merged source PRs without increasing the strict verified-outcomes metric.
xLagerFeuer commentedon Nov 12, 2026
Upstream upgrade batch 26 — source-disjoint negative screening (2026-11-12)
Upstream PR #261 MERGED as
39d72cdcf6ceaa41bc89f6878ece8117d9b8201d, with required Repository integrity and portfolio verification SUCCESS. Combined default-branch 695/695 Python tests PASS, workspace/bootstrap/Harness Status/functional projections checked; no local source changes remain.main. Five distinct included S1=A/S2=C assessments at canonical Index SHA85ae995fc2551ac0a076609bce0300d075cac2d5, excluding 25 prior candidate batches and the working-fork registry.CLOSED_NO_CHANGE(Personal Agent Runtime atomic SQLite admission; kube-agents explicit class slot reservation; Kata Symphony conflict dedup TTL) and 2BLOCKED_EVIDENCE(botler-agent speculative accounting-panic tail; Claw-Empire stale parent readiness unproven and original open PR research(upstream): finish native-only batch 06, freeze batch 07 #91 overlap).assessment_candidate_batches.py next ... --index-root <pinned Index>returnsNO_ACTIONABLE_CANDIDATE.Next per contract: freeze a new source-disjoint five-assessment cohort only after reconciling current Index/main, with any strict S2 hypothesis preregistered ahead of source inspection. Do not repurpose these negative rows into alleged fixes.
xLagerFeuer commentedon Nov 12, 2026
Batch 27 — Oh My Hermes native S2 lock fix published (2026-11-12)
Actual original external PR: witt3rd/oh-my-hermes #28 — OPEN, Ready for review, original
master@3b06e33ae67b202b342989b484f08143e65e250d, contributor head6eced4fdad9ff4faa7daf0979021d870558e8d26, 1 commit, exactly 2 first-party Python source/test files. Maintainer has not accepted or merged it. Fork-local PR #1 and original PR have identical title/body with v3 AI assessment disclosure (SHA256142f0a0eae0162708b6727544696975b552e40e79c3a896340e94a5a7cfa569e). Authenticated actor xLagerFeuer via trusted dev-alpha-2, current owner standing P1 preparation and separate publication mandates, source/fork/branch/license/readback controls verified.Pre-source evidence: five source-disjoint assessment hypotheses published
9e2c1e9before original source inspection, pinned to Index85ae995f, reviewed2026-10-27, originalreview_ref=3b06e33. Batch 27 owner packet has 1 strict ASSESSMENT_DERIVED fix, 1 CLOSED_NO_CHANGE, 3 BLOCKED_EVIDENCE (Evot unlicensed; two not source-native proven). Source first-party regression showed two contenders both receiving the sameacquired=Truelock after non-atomic stale reclaim (RED), then same focused test GREEN after rechecked SQLite-guarded stale deletion, full plugin suite on actual fork head 195 PASS / 7 SKIP. Native receipt and hashes preserved.Internal review sequence: Upstream #262 merged batch/packet, #263 merged narrowly scoped native two-file writer allowlist and combined hash, #264 merged verified original/fork-local publication readback and added original #28 to 34-target read-only maintainer watchlist, current
main@666f09d0dab0b8c6cf89b0d5c2dd540838b13334. Upstream registration 702/702 tests PASS, required GitHub CI passed. Official watcher run #43284969509 manually dispatched on current main to register next checkpoint.No attribution beyond evidence: publication and native tests do not demonstrate third-party acceptance, deployed benefit, independent human code review, or an Index S2 C→A autonomy grade. Frozen screening manifest remains historical
AWAITING_EXTERNAL; current readbacks supply the later actual publication state. Continue next source-disjoint five-repository wave and watch maintainer review/CI through issue #125; no external merge authority.xLagerFeuer commentedon Nov 12, 2026
Upstream upgrade batch 28 — five source-disjoint S2 screens complete (2026-11-12)
Internal PR #265 merged as
fbdf3250a795872a6c3b7cc7fc2f7f3f75f31487, 2/2 GitHub checks green. Immutable pre-source hypothesis commitaee29e7preceded current-source inspection. Five-row native-fit summary and exact frozen candidate manifest are on main at canonical Index85ae995f.Outcomes: Manyhands, Ylva, Agent Harness Kit, Snow Core =
CLOSED_NO_CHANGE(mechanisms already close the pre-registered gap); Kandev =BLOCKED_EVIDENCE(no deterministic concurrentnew_workspacedouble-allocation witness; its contributor policy requires manual tests and prior architectural issue discussion). 0 qualified fixes, 0 new original/fork writes, 0 external PRs in this wave; no false native-test pass, VSM grade change or maintainer adoption. Upstream internal validations and 702/702 tests PASS; batch controller reportsNO_ACTIONABLE_CANDIDATE.Working-fork publication of Oh My Hermes #28 belongs only to previous batch 27 and is not counted here. The manually dispatched 34-target watcher run #43284969509 completed successfully. Proceed to pre-register fresh, independent five-source batch 29.
xLagerFeuer commentedon Nov 12, 2026
2026-11-12 parallel-batch reconciliation (read-only effect, no merge): While processing operator-requested
upstream upgrade batch 10, the integrated PR #265 already froze/completed five-source batch 28. The provisional ten-source PR #266 overlapped five exact original sources (manyhands, ylva, kandev, agent-harness-kit, snow-core), was marked superseded and closed without merge. The remaining five read-only source screens are not admitted as another numbered cohort; three (macher-agent, Linear Coding Agent Harness, agent-cli) overlap the independently activeresearch/upstream-upgrade-batch-29-20261112, whose current frozen manifest also contains agent-of-empires and fiber. A separate provisionalresearch/assessment-upgrade-b29-ten-20261112branch contains only preregistration, not an admitted batch; do not use it as a competing reservation or publication head. Existing main/active batch owner has priority. Local-only 700 tests passed for discarded prospective data materialization, but no new native RED/GREEN, external patch, original PR, Index regrade or accepted benefit was established. This report prevents double-counting and protects serial source ownership.xLagerFeuer commentedon Nov 12, 2026
Batch 29 — source-disjoint S2 negative screens (2026-11-12)
Upstream #267 MERGED as
ce9fa4b, with required GitHub CIrepository-integrityand portfolioverifySUCCESS. Five distinct includedS1=A/S2=CIndex records, immutable Index85ae995f; two prospective falsifier commits0f67323andd151fadoccurred before first-party source inspection, frozen five-source manifest at240df33. Current source-native read-only screens: 2 CLOSED_NO_CHANGE (Agent of Empires worktree rollback and Fiber failed delegate cleanup), 3 BLOCKED_EVIDENCE (Macher stale parent/child VFS merge lacks genuine Emacs test runner, Linear external claim lacks first-party CAS reproduction, Agent CLI failed-launch orphan hypothesis unverified and separate issue #423 targets macOS/iTerm2). Five-row summary, manifest. 0 new native RED/GREEN runs, 0 admitted patches, 0 new external fork/PR writes, no external adoption, product benefit, Index grade or legal attestation claimed. Upstream local 702/702 tests PASS, current-main CI accepted. Controller returnsNO_ACTIONABLE_CANDIDATE. Next: freeze another complete distinct five-source cohort from the current canonical Index, preregister actual falsifiers ahead of target source inspection. Existing external Oh My Hermes #28 remains separate from this cohort.xLagerFeuer commentedon Nov 12, 2026
Batch 32 — source-disjoint S2 negative screening (2026-11-12)
Upstream PR #272 MERGED as
25b157cebf63f4b00e801ef60d3bb5a45ac3e3ce, with protected-branchrepository-integrityand read-only portfolioverifychecks both SUCCESS. After incorporating the independent read-only batch-discovery PR #270, owning Upstream 708/708 tests PASS; exact Index pin / registry / fork-bootstrap / Harness Status / portfolio / functional and outcome validators PASS.Five newly selected, source-disjoint included
S1=A/S2=Ccanonical Index assessments at immutable85ae995fc2551ac0a076609bce0300d075cac2d5were prospectively pre-registered before source inspection in commit98b08b3, then frozen at51d7ad5. Five-row machine-readable manifest and source-native screening details: 3CLOSED_NO_CHANGE(ucode rejection-safe Promise lock chain; CodeWhip safe tiny-budget rounding and zero-child rejection; Phone Harness phone lock released infinally), 2BLOCKED_EVIDENCE(OwnPilot stale task claim after crash lacks supported database reproducer; yottacode complex symlink file-claim alias lacks native Go reproducer and any actual security finding belongs in private source policy).0 admitted native technical patches, 0 new first-party RED/GREEN tests, 0 external fork/PR writes, 0 new live model/provider/phone trials, no human-only DCO, independent adoption, product benefit or Index grade attributed. The controller returns
NO_ACTIONABLE_CANDIDATE. Existing external Oh My Hermes #28 remains a separate Open/Ready contribution waiting on the original maintainer, without new review comments as of the most recent readback. Next complete source-disjoint wave requires the same pre-code hypothesis, license-first and independent native evidence gates.