Skip to content

Add public security policy - #1886

Open
BatmanAoD wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
add-security-policy
Open

BatmanAoD wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
add-security-policy

Conversation

@BatmanAoD

@BatmanAoD BatmanAoD commented Oct 8, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

Security reporting has been enabled for the repo. Link people to that feature.

Checklist

  • The PR targets the master branch
  • The above description motivates these changes.
  • The change is atomic and can be described by a single commit (your PR will be squashed on merge).
  • All changes to code are covered via unit tests.
  • Parameters and return values have type hints with PEP 484 syntax.
  • Functions and classes have useful Sphinx-style docstrings.
  • Live QPU tests have run via pytest test --live-qpu-access by myself or a reviewer.
  • (New Feature) The docs have been updated accordingly.
  • (User-visible change) A bullet has been added under "Unreleased" in the changelog.
  • (Bugfix) The associated issue is referenced above using auto-close keywords.
  • (Release) Version bump and changelog updated according to CONTRIBUTING.md.
  • (Release) There are no references to PENDING_DEPRECATION_RELEASE in deprecation warnings (see CONTRIBUTING.md).

@BatmanAoD
BatmanAoD marked this pull request as ready for review October 8, 2026 21:12
@BatmanAoD
BatmanAoD requested a review from a team as a code owner October 8, 2026 21:12
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Oct 8, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

☂️ Python Coverage

current status: ✅

Overall Coverage

Lines Covered Coverage Threshold Status
10405 9358 90% 87% 🟢

New Files

No new covered files...

Modified Files

No covered modified files...

updated for commit: 695389a by action🐍

@jselig-rigetti jselig-rigetti left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems reasonable to me - @erichulburd / @bramathon ?

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Oct 8, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🐰 Bencher Report

Projectpyquil
Branchadd-security-policy
Testbedci-runner-linux

⚠️ WARNING: No Threshold found!

Without a Threshold, no Alerts will ever be generated.

Click here to create a new Threshold
For more information, see the Threshold documentation.
To only post results if a Threshold exists, set the --ci-only-thresholds flag.

Click to view all benchmark results
BenchmarkLatencymilliseconds (ms)
test/benchmarks/test_program.py::test_copy_everything_except_instructions📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
9,427.98 ms
test/benchmarks/test_program.py::test_instructions📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
3,261.68 ms
test/benchmarks/test_program.py::test_iteration📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
3,253.49 ms
test/benchmarks/test_simulators.py::TestJitCompileTime::test_density_matrix_compile_depth[20L]📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
234.69 ms
test/benchmarks/test_simulators.py::TestJitCompileTime::test_density_matrix_compile_depth[40L]📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
258.07 ms
test/benchmarks/test_simulators.py::TestJitCompileTime::test_density_matrix_compile_depth[5L]📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
216.05 ms
test/benchmarks/test_simulators.py::TestJitCompileTime::test_state_vector_compile_depth[10L]📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
203.83 ms
test/benchmarks/test_simulators.py::TestJitCompileTime::test_state_vector_compile_depth[40L]📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
195.44 ms
test/benchmarks/test_simulators.py::TestJitCompileTime::test_state_vector_compile_depth[80L]📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
225.14 ms
test/benchmarks/test_simulators.py::TestPerformance::test_17q_batch_size[b16]📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
137,107.48 ms
test/benchmarks/test_simulators.py::TestPerformance::test_17q_batch_size[b64]📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
121,705.22 ms
test/benchmarks/test_simulators.py::TestPerformance::test_17q_batch_size[b8]📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
160,088.40 ms
test/benchmarks/test_simulators.py::TestPerformance::test_scaling_batch_size[b16]📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
43,889.12 ms
test/benchmarks/test_simulators.py::TestPerformance::test_scaling_batch_size[b64]📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
29,110.78 ms
test/benchmarks/test_simulators.py::TestPerformance::test_scaling_batch_size[b8]📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
65,180.98 ms
test/benchmarks/test_simulators.py::TestPerformance::test_scaling_depth[10L]📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
33,575.07 ms
test/benchmarks/test_simulators.py::TestPerformance::test_scaling_depth[1L]📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
13,658.74 ms
test/benchmarks/test_simulators.py::TestPerformance::test_scaling_depth[20L]📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
55,515.35 ms
test/benchmarks/test_simulators.py::TestPerformance::test_scaling_depth[3L]📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
18,192.05 ms
test/benchmarks/test_simulators.py::TestPerformance::test_scaling_qubits[12q]📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
11,322.79 ms
test/benchmarks/test_simulators.py::TestPerformance::test_scaling_qubits[15q]📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
33,670.09 ms
test/benchmarks/test_simulators.py::TestPerformance::test_scaling_qubits[3q]📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
3,458.28 ms
test/benchmarks/test_simulators.py::TestPerformance::test_scaling_qubits[6q]📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
4,857.12 ms
test/benchmarks/test_simulators.py::TestPerformance::test_scaling_qubits[9q]📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
6,871.36 ms
test/benchmarks/test_simulators.py::TestPerformance::test_scaling_subsystem_size[s0]📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
94,549.57 ms
test/benchmarks/test_simulators.py::TestPerformance::test_scaling_subsystem_size[s1]📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
33,657.75 ms
test/benchmarks/test_simulators.py::TestPerformance::test_surface17_depth5_cycle_noise📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
77,112.77 ms
test/benchmarks/test_simulators.py::TestPerformance::test_surface17_depth5_cycle_noise_low_trajectory📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
4,889.18 ms
test/benchmarks/test_simulators.py::TestPerformance::test_surface17_depth5_cycle_noise_measurements_only_micro📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
2,208.83 ms
test/benchmarks/test_simulators.py::TestPerformance::test_surface17_depth5_cycle_noise_micro📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
4,269.59 ms
test/benchmarks/test_simulators.py::TestPerformance::test_surface17_depth5_cycle_noise_micro_jit📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
60.66 ms
test/benchmarks/test_simulators.py::TestPerformance::test_surface17_depth5_cycle_noise_no_measurements_micro📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
2,748.44 ms
🐰 View full continuous benchmarking report in Bencher

@BatmanAoD
BatmanAoD force-pushed the add-security-policy branch from 35c336c to 695389a Compare October 8, 2026 23:05

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants