less clones and more cleanup for rustc_builtin_macros - #162234
Conversation
|
@bors try @rust-timer queue |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
less clones and more cleanup for `rustc_builtin_macros`
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
Finished benchmarking commit (73366f0): comparison URL. Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - please read:Benchmarking means the PR may be perf-sensitive. It's automatically marked not fit for rolling up. Overriding is possible but disadvised: it risks changing compiler perf. Next, please: If you can, justify the regressions found in this try perf run in writing along with @bors rollup=never rustc-perf Instruction countOur most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.
Max RSS (memory usage)Results (primary 1.2%, secondary 4.4%)A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.
CyclesResults (primary -3.7%, secondary -3.8%)A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.
Binary sizeThis perf run didn't have relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: 476.065s -> 474.054s (-0.42%) |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
fb78a2f to
785ad11
Compare
Currently based on #161867, blocked on that PR being merged.