Repository navigation
restore the old behavior for derive(Default) on fieldless types
#164114
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
+77
−2
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ | ||
| //! Regression test for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/164078, | ||
| //! where some attribute macros relied on the generated code always being | ||
| //! `Unit {}` and not `Unit()` or `Unit`. | ||
| //@ check-pass | ||
| //@ proc-macro: rewrite-fieldless-type-kind.rs | ||
|
|
||
| extern crate rewrite_fieldless_type_kind; | ||
| use rewrite_fieldless_type_kind::*; | ||
|
|
||
| #[derive(Default)] | ||
| #[to_unit] | ||
| struct UnitToUnit; | ||
|
|
||
| #[derive(Default)] | ||
| #[to_tuple] | ||
| struct UnitToTuple; | ||
|
|
||
| #[derive(Default)] | ||
| #[to_braced] | ||
| struct UnitToBraced; | ||
|
|
||
| #[derive(Default)] | ||
| #[to_unit] | ||
| struct TupleToUnit(); | ||
|
|
||
| #[derive(Default)] | ||
| #[to_tuple] | ||
| struct TupleToTuple(); | ||
|
|
||
| #[derive(Default)] | ||
| #[to_braced] | ||
| struct TupleToBraced(); | ||
|
|
||
| #[derive(Default)] | ||
| #[to_unit] | ||
| struct BracedToUnit {} | ||
|
|
||
| #[derive(Default)] | ||
| #[to_tuple] | ||
| struct BracedToTuple {} | ||
|
|
||
| #[derive(Default)] | ||
| #[to_braced] | ||
| struct BracedToBraced {} | ||
|
|
||
| fn main() {} |
20 changes: 20 additions & 0 deletions
20
tests/ui/derives/default/auxiliary/rewrite-fieldless-type-kind.rs
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@ | ||
| extern crate proc_macro; | ||
| use proc_macro::TokenStream; | ||
|
|
||
| #[proc_macro_attribute] | ||
| pub fn to_unit(_: TokenStream, struct_item: TokenStream) -> TokenStream { | ||
| rewrite(struct_item, ";") | ||
| } | ||
| #[proc_macro_attribute] | ||
| pub fn to_tuple(_: TokenStream, struct_item: TokenStream) -> TokenStream { | ||
| rewrite(struct_item, "();") | ||
| } | ||
| #[proc_macro_attribute] | ||
| pub fn to_braced(_: TokenStream, struct_item: TokenStream) -> TokenStream { | ||
| rewrite(struct_item, "{}") | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| fn rewrite(struct_item: TokenStream, suffix: &str) -> TokenStream { | ||
| let ident = struct_item.into_iter().nth(1).unwrap(); | ||
| format!("struct {ident}{suffix}").parse().unwrap() | ||
| } |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is also interesting: the
Defaultderive produces an error on stable (expected struct, variant or union type, found enumSpooky), on beta (theSelfconstructor can only be used with tuple or unit structs), but #163863 caused it to compile. After this PR, it will fail again as on stable. Is this okay?View changes since the review
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We shouldn't make any "this code now starts compiling" changes without going through some kind of process, so this is a bug in its own right.
Can you double check none such things slipped through in your other builtin macro refactorings? I remember you writing a series of prs.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Matching stable sounds reasonable to me.