Skip to content

improvement(layout): a guideline for the page patterns (CUI-52) - #1223

Open
Cuervino wants to merge 3 commits into
development/1.0from
improvement/CUI-52-layout-guideline
Open

Cuervino wants to merge 3 commits into
development/1.0from
improvement/CUI-52-layout-guideline

Conversation

@Cuervino

@Cuervino Cuervino commented Sep 18, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Templates/Layout had nine stories and no guideline, so the page composition rules existed nowhere. The AppContainer slots were demonstrated in code, but nothing stated what goes in each slot, for which type of page, or when the overall summary applies. Two stories even labelled it "optional", which left the decision to whoever built the screen.

What the rules are based on

An inventory of the twelve ARTESCA listing pages: Truststore, Locations, Data Services, Identity Providers, Accounts, Virtual machines, Users, Groups, Nodes, Volumes and All Buckets. Every rule below classifies all twelve without exception.

What is added

stories/layout.guideline.mdx:

  • the three slots, and what the context bar is for
  • the two resource listing page forms, full page and list-detail, each with what it is, when to use it, and its composition rules
  • browsable collections, which govern the breadcrumb, the presence of the overall summary, the level stated in the header, and the control that moves up one level
  • dashboards, which have no canonical composition, with the condition under which one should be promoted to a pattern
  • forms, marked as not yet defined

ResourceListPage in stories/layout.stories.tsx, embedded in the guideline. It composes the overall summary and a real Table with its search and create button. The existing stories demonstrate the plumbing with placeholder panels, which is not something anyone can start from. This one is meant to be copied.

Known follow-up

The guideline documents two page patterns. The list-detail form has no story of its own yet.

Generated with with a deep interaction with Claude Code.

Templates/Layout had nine stories and no guideline, so nothing stated what
goes in each AppContainer slot, for which type of page, or when the overall
summary applies. Two stories labelled it "optional", which left the decision
to whoever built the screen.

The rules come from an inventory of the twelve ARTESCA listing pages. They
cover the two resource listing forms, full page and list-detail, what
browsability governs, dashboards without a canonical composition, and forms
as not yet defined.

A ResourceListPage story composes the pattern with a real Table, so it can be
copied rather than only read.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@bert-e

bert-e commented Sep 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hello cuervino,

My role is to assist you with the merge of this
pull request. Please type @bert-e help to get information
on this process, or consult the user documentation.

Available options
name description privileged authored
/after_pull_request Wait for the given pull request id to be merged before continuing with the current one.
/bypass_author_approval Bypass the pull request author's approval ⭐
/bypass_build_status Bypass the build and test status ⭐
/bypass_commit_size Bypass the check on the size of the changeset TBA ⭐
/bypass_incompatible_branch Bypass the check on the source branch prefix ⭐
/bypass_jira_check Bypass the Jira issue check ⭐
/bypass_peer_approval Bypass the pull request peers' approval ⭐
/bypass_leader_approval Bypass the pull request leaders' approval ⭐
/bypass_source_branch_lineage Bypass the cross-branch contamination check ⭐
/approve Instruct Bert-E that the author has approved the pull request. ✍️
/create_pull_requests Allow the creation of integration pull requests.
/create_integration_branches Allow the creation of integration branches.
/no_octopus Prevent Wall-E from doing any octopus merge and use multiple consecutive merge instead
/unanimity Change review acceptance criteria from one reviewer at least to all reviewers
/wait Instruct Bert-E not to run until further notice.
Available commands
name description privileged
/help Print Bert-E's manual in the pull request.
/status Print Bert-E's current status in the pull request.
/clear Remove all comments from Bert-E from the history TBA
/retry Re-start a fresh build TBA
/build Re-start a fresh build TBA
/force_reset Delete integration branches & pull requests, and restart merge process from the beginning.
/reset Try to remove integration branches unless there are commits on them which do not appear on the source branch.

Status report is not available.

@bert-e

bert-e commented Sep 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Waiting for approval

The following approvals are needed before I can proceed with the merge:

  • the author

  • one peer

Peer approvals must include at least 1 approval from the following list:

Comment thread stories/layout.guideline.mdx Outdated
@bert-e

bert-e commented Sep 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Waiting for approval

The following approvals are needed before I can proceed with the merge:

  • the author

  • one peer

Peer approvals must include at least 1 approval from the following list:

Comment thread stories/layout.guideline.mdx Outdated
Comment thread stories/layout.guideline.mdx Outdated
Cuervino and others added 2 commits September 21, 2026 14:30
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
…l (CUI-52)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants