Repository navigation
Fix ALTER TABLE ADD with a parenthesized column list
#557
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
+194
−4
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🗄️ Data Integrity & Integration | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick win
🔎 Supported by static analysis
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: WordPress/sqlite-database-integration
Length of output: 5227
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: WordPress/sqlite-database-integration
Length of output: 42138
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: WordPress/sqlite-database-integration
Length of output: 41776
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: WordPress/sqlite-database-integration
Length of output: 21898
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: WordPress/sqlite-database-integration
Length of output: 8388
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: WordPress/sqlite-database-integration
Length of output: 2108
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: WordPress/sqlite-database-integration
Length of output: 1718
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: WordPress/sqlite-database-integration
Length of output: 2923
Record inline CHECK constraints for listed columns.
If
ALTER TABLE t ADD (a INT CHECK (a > 0))succeeds,record_add_columndoes not persist the inlineCHECKmetadata. The separatetableConstraintDefpass does not process a check nested incolumnDefinition. Table recreation reads CHECK clauses fromcheck_constraints, so it can omit this constraint and accepta = 0.This limitation also existed in the pre-existing single-column
ADD COLUMNpath because both paths callrecord_add_column. The PR did not introduce the limitation, but the ADD-list path still needs the same inline CHECK handling asrecord_create_table.Suggested fix
if ( null !== $constraint_data ) { $this->insert_values( $this->get_table_name( $table_is_temporary, 'table_constraints' ), $constraint_data ); } + + $check_constraint_data = $this->extract_check_constraint_data( $node, $table_name ); + if ( null !== $check_constraint_data ) { + $this->insert_values( + $this->get_table_name( $table_is_temporary, 'check_constraints' ), + $check_constraint_data + ); + } }🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I created #562 to track the inline
CHECKgaps, including the existing single-columnADDcase. I'll keep this PR focused on parenthesizedADDlists.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@JanJakes Understood. The inline
CHECKgap predates this PR, so tracking it in#562is reasonable. I won’t request that fix in this PR; keep this change focused on parenthesizedADDlists.You are interacting with an AI system.