Skip to content

[ci] Run audited semver checks in parallel - #3587

Open
joshlf wants to merge 1 commit into
Gcl7ijadfh2m7eft4ucy5czoaghddreiqfrom
Gqs4rhblhbsqga3glvc6tfjnakpdspo3b
Open

[ci] Run audited semver checks in parallel#3587
joshlf wants to merge 1 commit into
Gcl7ijadfh2m7eft4ucy5czoaghddreiqfrom
Gqs4rhblhbsqga3glvc6tfjnakpdspo3b

Conversation

@joshlf

@joshlf joshlf commented Aug 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Move semver checks out of selected build_test cells and into a
standalone target-only matrix derived by the typed planner. Reduced
events select the three targets covered by the matching ordinary-build
slice; full events select all nine configured, non-waived targets.
Publish that matrix and its enable gate with the other checked outputs,
and include every decision in the versioned plan artifact.

Give each semver cell a fresh hosted runner which depends only on
plan_ci. It can start in parallel with Docker image construction and the
ordinary matrix instead of waiting for an image download, image load,
and complete ordinary build in its former build_test cell. The expected
critical-path saving is roughly that formerly serialized setup and build
duration; the exact wall-clock improvement remains runner- and
cache-dependent.

Keep checkout, commit-message skip handling, and the pinned action in
one exactly audited three-step job. Derive the action's static inputs
from checked policy and Cargo metadata, model its logical work and exact
inputs in execution-parity checks, and reject extra job fields, steps,
conditions, environment, or workflow authority.

Use matrix.target for both rust-target and prefix-key. The action's
automatic baseline-rustdoc cache key omits the Rust target. This keeps
concurrent targets from reading and writing one cache entry. Adapt only
the historical job name and missing cache prefix at the frozen-evidence
boundary; the live plan and workflow remain strict.

Extend all-jobs-succeed's planner-controlled optional-job protocol from
Miri to semver. An enabled semver job must succeed, while a disabled job
must produce its corresponding planned skip. Match the total skip count
to both gates so an unrelated skipped dependency cannot pass.

Make build_test end at its typed executor, register the new planned job,
and audit both the target-only matrix consumer and its planner output
protocol. Removing build_test's generated Docker shell must not weaken
its prerequisite boundary: retain the exact setup and anchor audit, the
local-action source snapshot, and the checkout integrity gate directly
before the executor.

Tests: ./tools/cargo.sh test -p zc
Tests: ./tools/cargo.sh clippy -p zc --all-targets --offline --
-D warnings
Tests: ./ci/check_actions.sh

Authored by an agent, posting via joshlf's account


Latest Update: v29 — Compare vs v28

📚 Full Patch History

Links show the diff between the row version and the column version.

Version v28 v27 v26 v25 v24 v23 v22 v21 v20 v19 v18 v17 v16 v15 v14 v13 v12 v11 v10 v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v29 v28 v27 v26 v25 v24 v23 v22 v21 v20 v19 v18 v17 v16 v15 v14 v13 v12 v11 v10 v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v28 v27 v26 v25 v24 v23 v22 v21 v20 v19 v18 v17 v16 v15 v14 v13 v12 v11 v10 v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v27 v26 v25 v24 v23 v22 v21 v20 v19 v18 v17 v16 v15 v14 v13 v12 v11 v10 v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v26 v25 v24 v23 v22 v21 v20 v19 v18 v17 v16 v15 v14 v13 v12 v11 v10 v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v25 v24 v23 v22 v21 v20 v19 v18 v17 v16 v15 v14 v13 v12 v11 v10 v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v24 v23 v22 v21 v20 v19 v18 v17 v16 v15 v14 v13 v12 v11 v10 v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v23 v22 v21 v20 v19 v18 v17 v16 v15 v14 v13 v12 v11 v10 v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v22 v21 v20 v19 v18 v17 v16 v15 v14 v13 v12 v11 v10 v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v21 v20 v19 v18 v17 v16 v15 v14 v13 v12 v11 v10 v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v20 v19 v18 v17 v16 v15 v14 v13 v12 v11 v10 v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v19 v18 v17 v16 v15 v14 v13 v12 v11 v10 v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v18 v17 v16 v15 v14 v13 v12 v11 v10 v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v17 v16 v15 v14 v13 v12 v11 v10 v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v16 v15 v14 v13 v12 v11 v10 v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v15 v14 v13 v12 v11 v10 v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v14 v13 v12 v11 v10 v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v13 v12 v11 v10 v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v12 v11 v10 v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v11 v10 v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v10 v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v3 v2 v1 Base
v2 v1 Base
v1 Base
⬇️ Download this PR

Branch

git fetch origin refs/heads/Gqs4rhblhbsqga3glvc6tfjnakpdspo3b && git checkout -b pr-Gqs4rhblhbsqga3glvc6tfjnakpdspo3b FETCH_HEAD

Checkout

git fetch origin refs/heads/Gqs4rhblhbsqga3glvc6tfjnakpdspo3b && git checkout FETCH_HEAD

Cherry Pick

git fetch origin refs/heads/Gqs4rhblhbsqga3glvc6tfjnakpdspo3b && git cherry-pick FETCH_HEAD

Pull

git pull origin refs/heads/Gqs4rhblhbsqga3glvc6tfjnakpdspo3b

Stacked PRs enabled by GHerrit.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: e53b901bb4

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread tools/zc/src/semver_adapter.rs Outdated
Comment thread tools/zc/src/semver_adapter.rs Outdated
Comment thread tools/zc/src/semver_adapter.rs Outdated
@joshlf
joshlf force-pushed the Gqs4rhblhbsqga3glvc6tfjnakpdspo3b branch from e53b901 to 08726ef Compare August 25, 2026 18:32
@joshlf
joshlf force-pushed the Gvwvbb4qvqvk2nt4mdo3fp333lmrtmydn branch from 2c3096c to 01b16a9 Compare August 25, 2026 18:32
@joshlf
joshlf changed the base branch from Gvwvbb4qvqvk2nt4mdo3fp333lmrtmydn to Gcl7ijadfh2m7eft4ucy5czoaghddreiq August 25, 2026 18:40

joshlf commented Aug 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Authored by an agent, posting via joshlf's account

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. 🚀

Reviewed commit: 08726ef78a

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@joshlf
joshlf force-pushed the Gcl7ijadfh2m7eft4ucy5czoaghddreiq branch from 89b8771 to f9ea695 Compare August 25, 2026 22:48
@joshlf
joshlf force-pushed the Gqs4rhblhbsqga3glvc6tfjnakpdspo3b branch from 08726ef to 762a0dc Compare August 25, 2026 22:48
@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Aug 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 91.85%. Comparing base (e1eeb8b) to head (985bbcd).

Additional details and impacted files
@@                        Coverage Diff                         @@
##           Gcl7ijadfh2m7eft4ucy5czoaghddreiq    #3587   +/-   ##
==================================================================
  Coverage                              91.85%   91.85%           
==================================================================
  Files                                     20       20           
  Lines                                   6093     6093           
==================================================================
  Hits                                    5597     5597           
  Misses                                   496      496           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@joshlf
joshlf force-pushed the Gcl7ijadfh2m7eft4ucy5czoaghddreiq branch from 231d8b3 to d0426b3 Compare August 26, 2026 20:11
@joshlf
joshlf force-pushed the Gqs4rhblhbsqga3glvc6tfjnakpdspo3b branch from 6a81fe4 to 5c8b678 Compare August 26, 2026 20:11
@joshlf

joshlf commented Aug 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Authored by an agent, posting via joshlf's account

@codex review

Please review the current head, 5c8b6785867e6ae26eb658bb37926bc6ccb93c49.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. You're on a roll.

Reviewed commit: 5c8b678586

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@joshlf
joshlf force-pushed the Gqs4rhblhbsqga3glvc6tfjnakpdspo3b branch from 5c8b678 to ec0310e Compare August 26, 2026 22:09
@joshlf
joshlf force-pushed the Gcl7ijadfh2m7eft4ucy5czoaghddreiq branch 2 times, most recently from c54bc3c to ffb5cd0 Compare August 26, 2026 22:35
@joshlf
joshlf force-pushed the Gqs4rhblhbsqga3glvc6tfjnakpdspo3b branch from ec0310e to 30dcd81 Compare August 26, 2026 22:35
@joshlf

joshlf commented Aug 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Authored by an agent, posting via joshlf's account

@codex review

Please review the current head, 30dcd81d123f66168363a33308d16ba6a853f52b.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. 🚀

Reviewed commit: 30dcd81d12

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@joshlf
joshlf force-pushed the Gcl7ijadfh2m7eft4ucy5czoaghddreiq branch from ffb5cd0 to eb2cc83 Compare August 26, 2026 23:31
@joshlf
joshlf force-pushed the Gqs4rhblhbsqga3glvc6tfjnakpdspo3b branch 2 times, most recently from b8fe2df to a083de6 Compare August 27, 2026 01:18
@joshlf
joshlf force-pushed the Gcl7ijadfh2m7eft4ucy5czoaghddreiq branch from eb2cc83 to 3c014ce Compare August 27, 2026 01:18
@joshlf
joshlf force-pushed the Gqs4rhblhbsqga3glvc6tfjnakpdspo3b branch from a083de6 to da22c8c Compare August 27, 2026 10:15
@joshlf

joshlf commented Aug 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Authored by an agent, posting via joshlf's account

@codex review

Please review the current head, da22c8c420e42060bde857aab101910b2b1f6945.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Keep them coming!

Reviewed commit: da22c8c420

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@joshlf
joshlf force-pushed the Gcl7ijadfh2m7eft4ucy5czoaghddreiq branch from 38e0cf2 to 7ed08a4 Compare August 27, 2026 10:56
@joshlf
joshlf force-pushed the Gqs4rhblhbsqga3glvc6tfjnakpdspo3b branch from da22c8c to 6f9c0bc Compare August 27, 2026 10:56
@joshlf
joshlf force-pushed the Gcl7ijadfh2m7eft4ucy5czoaghddreiq branch from 7ed08a4 to bda6d18 Compare August 27, 2026 12:04
@joshlf
joshlf force-pushed the Gqs4rhblhbsqga3glvc6tfjnakpdspo3b branch from 6f9c0bc to 545c5e9 Compare August 27, 2026 12:04
@joshlf

joshlf commented Aug 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Authored by an agent, posting via joshlf's account

@codex review

Please review the current head, 545c5e9c59f3be2db661683439f7f4a25063d0e6.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Keep it up!

Reviewed commit: 545c5e9c59

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Move semver checks out of selected build_test cells and into a
standalone target-only matrix derived by the typed planner. Reduced
events select the three targets covered by the matching ordinary-build
slice; full events select all nine configured, non-waived targets.
Publish that matrix and its enable gate with the other checked outputs,
and include every decision in the versioned plan artifact.

Give each semver cell a fresh hosted runner which depends only on
plan_ci. It can start in parallel with Docker image construction and the
ordinary matrix instead of waiting for an image download, image load,
and complete ordinary build in its former build_test cell. The expected
critical-path saving is roughly that formerly serialized setup and build
duration; the exact wall-clock improvement remains runner- and
cache-dependent.

Keep checkout, commit-message skip handling, and the pinned action in
one exactly audited three-step job. Derive the action's static inputs
from checked policy and Cargo metadata, model its logical work and exact
inputs in execution-parity checks, and reject extra job fields, steps,
conditions, environment, or workflow authority.

Use matrix.target for both rust-target and prefix-key. The action's
automatic baseline-rustdoc cache key omits the Rust target. This keeps
concurrent targets from reading and writing one cache entry. Adapt only
the historical job name and missing cache prefix at the frozen-evidence
boundary; the live plan and workflow remain strict.

Extend all-jobs-succeed's planner-controlled optional-job protocol from
Miri to semver. An enabled semver job must succeed, while a disabled job
must produce its corresponding planned skip. Match the total skip count
to both gates so an unrelated skipped dependency cannot pass.

Make build_test end at its typed executor, register the new planned job,
and audit both the target-only matrix consumer and its planner output
protocol. Removing build_test's generated Docker shell must not weaken
its prerequisite boundary: retain the exact setup and anchor audit, the
local-action source snapshot, and the checkout integrity gate directly
before the executor.

Tests: ./tools/cargo.sh test -p zc
Tests: ./tools/cargo.sh clippy -p zc --all-targets --offline --
       -D warnings
Tests: ./ci/check_actions.sh

*Authored by an agent, posting via joshlf's account*

gherrit-pr-id: Gqs4rhblhbsqga3glvc6tfjnakpdspo3b
@joshlf
joshlf force-pushed the Gcl7ijadfh2m7eft4ucy5czoaghddreiq branch from bda6d18 to e1eeb8b Compare August 27, 2026 12:26
@joshlf
joshlf force-pushed the Gqs4rhblhbsqga3glvc6tfjnakpdspo3b branch from 545c5e9 to 985bbcd Compare August 27, 2026 12:26
@joshlf

joshlf commented Aug 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Authored by an agent, posting via joshlf's account

@codex review

Please review the current head, 985bbcd483e3bf24527e862d38323d9023c0f8ce.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Bravo.

Reviewed commit: 985bbcd483

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants