Skip to content

[ci] Require execution parity before planning - #3598

Open
joshlf wants to merge 1 commit into
Gvwvbb4qvqvk2nt4mdo3fp333lmrtmydnfrom
Gnp4lv6jrqbhnp5pyd2625o7jwdguulmz
Open

[ci] Require execution parity before planning#3598
joshlf wants to merge 1 commit into
Gvwvbb4qvqvk2nt4mdo3fp333lmrtmydnfrom
Gnp4lv6jrqbhnp5pyd2625o7jwdguulmz

Conversation

@joshlf

@joshlf joshlf commented Aug 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The typed command model helps only if every caller checks it before a
plan can escape. Run its full legacy-parity proof while constructing
CiInputs, after policy, inventory, workflow, and baselines are trusted.

This centralizes the temporary CLI-level gate added with the command
model. Validation is now all-or-nothing: new planners and local commands
cannot omit the execution audit or consume a model which has drifted
from independently captured behavior.

Tests: cargo test -p zc --all-targets --offline
Tests: cargo clippy -p zc --all-targets --offline -- -D warnings

Authored by an agent, posting via joshlf's account


Latest Update: v13 — Compare vs v12

📚 Full Patch History

Links show the diff between the row version and the column version.

Version v12 v11 v10 v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v13 v12 v11 v10 v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v12 v11 v10 v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v11 v10 v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v10 v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v3 v2 v1 Base
v2 v1 Base
v1 Base
⬇️ Download this PR

Branch

git fetch origin refs/heads/Gnp4lv6jrqbhnp5pyd2625o7jwdguulmz && git checkout -b pr-Gnp4lv6jrqbhnp5pyd2625o7jwdguulmz FETCH_HEAD

Checkout

git fetch origin refs/heads/Gnp4lv6jrqbhnp5pyd2625o7jwdguulmz && git checkout FETCH_HEAD

Cherry Pick

git fetch origin refs/heads/Gnp4lv6jrqbhnp5pyd2625o7jwdguulmz && git cherry-pick FETCH_HEAD

Pull

git pull origin refs/heads/Gnp4lv6jrqbhnp5pyd2625o7jwdguulmz

Stacked PRs enabled by GHerrit.

joshlf commented Aug 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Authored by an agent, posting via joshlf's account

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Can't wait for the next one!

Reviewed commit: d206edd9d9

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Aug 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
⚠️ Please upload report for BASE (Gvwvbb4qvqvk2nt4mdo3fp333lmrtmydn@b58c1c7). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Additional details and impacted files
@@                         Coverage Diff                          @@
##             Gvwvbb4qvqvk2nt4mdo3fp333lmrtmydn    #3598   +/-   ##
====================================================================
  Coverage                                     ?   91.85%           
====================================================================
  Files                                        ?       20           
  Lines                                        ?     6093           
  Branches                                     ?        0           
====================================================================
  Hits                                         ?     5597           
  Misses                                       ?      496           
  Partials                                     ?        0           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@joshlf
joshlf force-pushed the Gnp4lv6jrqbhnp5pyd2625o7jwdguulmz branch from d206edd to 483b00c Compare August 25, 2026 22:48
@joshlf
joshlf force-pushed the Gvwvbb4qvqvk2nt4mdo3fp333lmrtmydn branch from 01b16a9 to 4fc813f Compare August 25, 2026 22:48

joshlf commented Aug 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Authored by an agent, posting via joshlf's account

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Already looking forward to the next diff.

Reviewed commit: 759330fde3

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@joshlf
joshlf force-pushed the Gnp4lv6jrqbhnp5pyd2625o7jwdguulmz branch from 759330f to 1948b30 Compare August 26, 2026 01:28
@joshlf
joshlf force-pushed the Gvwvbb4qvqvk2nt4mdo3fp333lmrtmydn branch from 6d4acec to 07225ee Compare August 26, 2026 01:28
@joshlf
joshlf force-pushed the Gnp4lv6jrqbhnp5pyd2625o7jwdguulmz branch from 1948b30 to 22ea145 Compare August 26, 2026 09:58
@joshlf
joshlf force-pushed the Gvwvbb4qvqvk2nt4mdo3fp333lmrtmydn branch from 07225ee to 0f51326 Compare August 26, 2026 09:58
@joshlf

joshlf commented Aug 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Authored by an agent, posting via joshlf's account

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Bravo.

Reviewed commit: 22ea1459b7

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@joshlf
joshlf force-pushed the Gnp4lv6jrqbhnp5pyd2625o7jwdguulmz branch from 22ea145 to f161861 Compare August 26, 2026 11:31
@joshlf

joshlf commented Aug 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Authored by an agent, posting via joshlf's account

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Can't wait for the next one!

Reviewed commit: f16186138f

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

The typed command model helps only if every caller checks it before a
plan can escape. Run its full legacy-parity proof while constructing
CiInputs, after policy, inventory, workflow, and baselines are trusted.

This centralizes the temporary CLI-level gate added with the command
model. Validation is now all-or-nothing: new planners and local commands
cannot omit the execution audit or consume a model which has drifted
from independently captured behavior.

Tests: cargo test -p zc --all-targets --offline
Tests: cargo clippy -p zc --all-targets --offline -- -D warnings

*Authored by an agent, posting via joshlf's account*

gherrit-pr-id: Gnp4lv6jrqbhnp5pyd2625o7jwdguulmz
@joshlf
joshlf force-pushed the Gvwvbb4qvqvk2nt4mdo3fp333lmrtmydn branch from 4d8e245 to b58c1c7 Compare August 26, 2026 11:58
@joshlf
joshlf force-pushed the Gnp4lv6jrqbhnp5pyd2625o7jwdguulmz branch from f161861 to 3bbba2e Compare August 26, 2026 11:58
@joshlf

joshlf commented Aug 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Authored by an agent, posting via joshlf's account

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Can't wait for the next one!

Reviewed commit: 3bbba2e4fb

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants