Skip to content

[ci] Project only executable cell selectors - #3590

Open
joshlf wants to merge 1 commit into
Gbsj7gxuv5hpi22zhup5w3fajtjjxnldjfrom
Gkr4fd4vz5vegygalblsmjjgpdq3eulsx
Open

[ci] Project only executable cell selectors#3590
joshlf wants to merge 1 commit into
Gbsj7gxuv5hpi22zhup5w3fajtjjxnldjfrom
Gkr4fd4vz5vegygalblsmjjgpdq3eulsx

Conversation

@joshlf

@joshlf joshlf commented Aug 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The compact Actions matrices still duplicated derived feature arguments,
target behavior, and Miri flags. The typed executor deliberately
resolves those details again from checked policy, so carrying both
representations would create a second contract which could drift.

Emit only the complete selectors accepted by each executor. Keep the
richer semantics in the human-facing plan artifact, where they remain
useful for review without becoming execution input.

Add exact compact-schema and output-size assertions so future transport
growth requires deliberate review.

Tests: cargo +1.93.1 test -p zc --all-targets --offline
cargo +1.93.1 clippy -p zc --all-targets --offline --
-D warnings

Authored by an agent, posting via joshlf's account


Latest Update: v10 — Compare vs v9

📚 Full Patch History

Links show the diff between the row version and the column version.

Version v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v10 v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v3 v2 v1 Base
v2 v1 Base
v1 Base
⬇️ Download this PR

Branch

git fetch origin refs/heads/Gkr4fd4vz5vegygalblsmjjgpdq3eulsx && git checkout -b pr-Gkr4fd4vz5vegygalblsmjjgpdq3eulsx FETCH_HEAD

Checkout

git fetch origin refs/heads/Gkr4fd4vz5vegygalblsmjjgpdq3eulsx && git checkout FETCH_HEAD

Cherry Pick

git fetch origin refs/heads/Gkr4fd4vz5vegygalblsmjjgpdq3eulsx && git cherry-pick FETCH_HEAD

Pull

git pull origin refs/heads/Gkr4fd4vz5vegygalblsmjjgpdq3eulsx

Stacked PRs enabled by GHerrit.

@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Aug 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 91.85%. Comparing base (4044dad) to head (b163bc5).

Additional details and impacted files
@@                        Coverage Diff                         @@
##           Gbsj7gxuv5hpi22zhup5w3fajtjjxnldj    #3590   +/-   ##
==================================================================
  Coverage                              91.85%   91.85%           
==================================================================
  Files                                     20       20           
  Lines                                   6093     6093           
==================================================================
  Hits                                    5597     5597           
  Misses                                   496      496           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

joshlf commented Aug 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Authored by an agent, posting via joshlf's account

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Bravo.

Reviewed commit: 1632fd792c

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

joshlf commented Aug 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Authored by an agent, posting via joshlf's account

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Swish!

Reviewed commit: acbdda54e5

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@joshlf
joshlf force-pushed the Gkr4fd4vz5vegygalblsmjjgpdq3eulsx branch from acbdda5 to b163bc5 Compare August 26, 2026 01:28
@joshlf
joshlf force-pushed the Gbsj7gxuv5hpi22zhup5w3fajtjjxnldj branch from 00059a2 to 4044dad Compare August 26, 2026 01:28
The compact Actions matrices still duplicated derived feature arguments,
target behavior, and Miri flags. The typed executor deliberately
resolves those details again from checked policy, so carrying both
representations would create a second contract which could drift.

Emit only the complete selectors accepted by each executor. Keep the
richer semantics in the human-facing plan artifact, where they remain
useful for review without becoming execution input.

Add exact compact-schema and output-size assertions so future transport
growth requires deliberate review.

Tests: cargo +1.93.1 test -p zc --all-targets --offline
       cargo +1.93.1 clippy -p zc --all-targets --offline --
         -D warnings

*Authored by an agent, posting via joshlf's account*

gherrit-pr-id: Gkr4fd4vz5vegygalblsmjjgpdq3eulsx
@joshlf
joshlf force-pushed the Gbsj7gxuv5hpi22zhup5w3fajtjjxnldj branch from 4044dad to f27177f Compare August 26, 2026 09:58
@joshlf
joshlf force-pushed the Gkr4fd4vz5vegygalblsmjjgpdq3eulsx branch from b163bc5 to 364653d Compare August 26, 2026 09:58
@joshlf

joshlf commented Aug 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Authored by an agent, posting via joshlf's account

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. 👍

Reviewed commit: 364653da0e

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants